My previous blog post on the aims is here: http://geordiescience.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/comparing-aims-of-science-national.html
There has been changes from the February document to the current one.
In February this paragraph was written under the title 'Purpose of Study':
The current draft is exactly the same, however it misses the last sentence.
I still don't like the first sentence of the purpose of study. I think it was wise not to call the separate sciences biology, chemistry and physics as the lines are very blurred, and I think it marginalises geology, astronomy, ecology etc as specific disciplines.
I am also left wondering about the omission of the last sentence. Is it irrelevant as we would teach lessons in the context of application anyway? Or has it be omitted because the wording isn't great: "the specific applications", which specific applications? I do think that it is important that in science lessons we are teaching students about the links between science and their lives, without this we are not preparing them for the science based decisions they may have to make.
The aims of the science curriculum have not changed at all.
In the light of the aims, my concerns about the omission of the last sentence of the purpose seem unfounded as preparing students for a scientific and technological world seem linked to the third aim of the curriculum here.
I think that I would have liked to see 'curiosity' in the aims. Students should not just answer questions, but learn to ask them too.
As key stage 3 is not assessed by an exam the aims do not need to be restricted to things that can be assess using a written exam.
I still like the aims of the 2008 PoS best:
I agree they are wooly, but they are admirable.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad